Their has been deemed "most useful" in recent reliable sources (for example, ).
Scientus ( talk) 06:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Reply I agree with Scientus that is more useful (mainly for its Arabic text, transliteration, more recent translations). The USC site doesn't have the Arabic, and has more translations, including all the translations USC has. Str1977 (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Reply More flexible would be something analogous to template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.Ĭan you Please change the usc cite quran template to the standard consistent source having multiple translations of form: Not done I don't think is better than the USC for this purpose USC also has multiple translations, and it's a much more reliable source than one created by a few volunteers with no academic reputation or editorial oversight. in surah x:y.", similar to the current example 10. contribs) - 20:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Reply There should be a template that does not contain the word Qu'ran but rather Surah, to be used in sentences like "the Quran refers to.Will change if no other comments received. MP (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Reply A reasonable suggestion. A nice versatile template! The only thing I would change is 'Al-Qur'an to Qur'an'.
0 kommentar(er)
